Short answer

In 2026 the median forest land transaction price in Latvia is 3,000 € per hectare (data through 6 August 2026, 1,291 transactions). Half of transactions happen in the range from 1,350 to 4,190 €/ha. For arable land in the same period the median is 4,591 €/ha. Since 2022 the median forest land price has not gone outside the 2,857–3,519 €/ha corridor.

Note: the publicly registered forest transaction price often is not the full amount paid — explained in section 5.

1. How the price has changed since 2022

The median forest land price has stayed within a narrow corridor over five years. The lowest median was in 2022 — 2,857 €/ha, the highest in 2023 — 3,519 €/ha. The difference between the lowest and highest year is 23%, and since 2024 the median has slid back down to around 3,000 €/ha.

For arable land the picture is different: the median grew for two years in a row — from 4,000 €/ha in 2022 to 4,965 €/ha in 2024 — and has since shrunk: 4,936 €/ha in 2025 and 4,591 €/ha in 2026.

Median transaction price, €/ha

Land transactions without buildings · 2026 through 6 August

Median price per hectare, 2022–2026 The median forest land price hovers around 3,000 euros per hectare; the median arable land price has grown from 4,000 to 4,965 euros and in 2026 is 4,591 euros per hectare. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Forest 2022: 2,857 €/haForest 2023: 3,519 €/haForest 2024: 3,494 €/haForest 2025: 2,950 €/haForest 2026: 3,000 €/haArable land 2022: 4,000 €/haArable land 2023: 4,498 €/haArable land 2024: 4,965 €/haArable land 2025: 4,936 €/haArable land 2026: 4,591 €/ha 4,591 Arable land 3,000 Forest

Forest land (≥ 80% of area) Arable land (≥ 80% of area)

Source: KALME calculation from VZD-registered transactions. Full figures — in the table below.
Median price and number of transactions by year, €/ha
Year Forest, median Forest, transactions Arable land, median Arable land, transactions
20222,8573,2274,0001,829
20233,5192,7604,4981,620
20243,4943,2434,9651,857
20252,9502,8334,9361,557
2026*3,0001,2914,591654

* 2026 is not a full year — the data covers the period through 6 August.

2. The median is misleading: the spread is huge

Naming a single figure for forest land is misleading, and this is clear in the spread. In 2026 the median is 3,000 €/ha, but the middle half of transactions falls between 1,350 and 4,190 €/ha — the upper bound is more than three times the lower one. A quarter of transactions happen below 1,350 €/ha, a quarter above 4,190 €/ha.

Practical meaning: if someone names a "forest price in Latvia" with a single number, that says nothing about a specific property. What matters is the stand's age, species composition, accessibility, encumbrances and location — and it is precisely these factors that create this spread.

Forest land price spread, €/ha

Band = the middle half of transactions (25th–75th percentile) · thick line = median

Forest land price spread by year In each year the middle half of transactions falls in a band from roughly 1,100–1,800 to 4,000–5,000 euros per hectare; the thick line is the median. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2022: half of transactions 1,164–4,627 €/ha, median 2,857 €/ha 4,627 1,164 2023: half of transactions 1,522–5,000 €/ha, median 3,519 €/ha 5,000 1,522 2024: half of transactions 1,778–4,717 €/ha, median 3,494 €/ha 4,717 1,778 2025: half of transactions 1,111–4,000 €/ha, median 2,950 €/ha 4,000 1,111 2026: half of transactions 1,350–4,190 €/ha, median 3,000 €/ha 4,190 1,350
The figures at the ends of the band are the 25th and 75th percentile. Outside the band lies half of transactions — a quarter below, a quarter above.

3. Forest vs. arable land

In all five years arable land has been more expensive than forest land. In 2026 the difference is 1,591 €/ha, or 53% — arable land 4,591 €/ha versus forest's 3,000 €/ha. The smallest difference was in 2023 (28%), the largest in 2025 (67%).

This comparison should not, however, be read as "forest is a worse investment". Arable land's price includes the full value, but a forest transaction's public price often does not include the value of the standing timber stock — see section 5.

4. Where forest is more expensive in Latvia

Comparing 2024–2026 transactions across 31 novads that had at least 40 forest transactions, the highest median price is in Ķekava novads — 4,545 €/ha, the lowest in Preiļi novads — 2,246 €/ha. The difference between the highest and lowest novads is twofold.

At the top of the list are the Pierīga novads, at the bottom Latgale. Why exactly that is — these figures don't say; checking the causes would require a separate analysis with control variables.

Forest land median price in all 31 novads with ≥40 transactions, 2024–2026 (€/ha)
Novads Median, €/ha Transactions
Ķekavas nov.4,54552
Ropažu nov.4,31043
Valkas nov.3,77868
Saulkrastu nov.3,62742
Saldus nov.3,513110
Siguldas nov.3,500131
Limbažu nov.3,447390
Cēsu nov.3,357263
Talsu nov.3,350311
Ogres nov.3,338214
Jelgavas nov.3,33353
Aizkraukles nov.3,300222
Smiltenes nov.3,300176
Kuldīgas nov.3,265193
Alūksnes nov.3,265253
Jēkabpils nov.3,250419
Madonas nov.3,226339
Ventspils nov.3,178109
Bauskas nov.3,174204
Dobeles nov.3,15988
Ludzas nov.3,115358
Dienvidkurzemes nov.3,102196
Gulbenes nov.3,077215
Balvu nov.3,066393
Valmieras nov.3,017343
Tukuma nov.3,014191
Rēzeknes nov.3,000587
Līvānu nov.2,95888
Krāslavas nov.2,936567
Augšdaugavas nov.2,512352
Preiļu nov.2,246313

The table includes all 31 novads that had at least 40 forest transactions in 2024–2026 (a total of 7,283 transactions). Novads with fewer transactions are not compared because the median becomes unstable. The location of each individual transaction can be viewed on the KALME map.

5. Why the public price isn't the full price

Important about forest transactions. In Latvia, forest sellers and buyers tend to sign two separate contracts — one for the real estate, another for the timber stock. Only the property contract is publicly registered, so the registered price can be lower than the amount actually paid.

This applies to all public forest price sources, including this article. The figures below are accurate in the sense that they reflect what was registered, but the registered and the paid amount do not always match in forest transactions.

One possible explanation for why the forest median is lower than for arable land is precisely these split contracts: this phenomenon does not exist for arable land transactions, because there the whole value is in a single contract. Whether that explains the entire difference cannot be determined from this data alone.

6. Methodology — how these figures are calculated

The figures are reproducible. For anyone who wants to check or cite them, here are the exact definitions.

  • Source: the State Land Service's Real Estate Market Database (NĪTIS), public transaction data.
  • Data volume: the KALME database holds 251,015 unique transactions, of which 240,170 since 2022. The data covers the period through 6 August 2026.
  • Duplicates: one transaction in the source can appear in several rows (for example, several parcels in one contract). Each transaction is counted once, by its transaction identifier.
  • Forest land: a land transaction without buildings, where forest land makes up at least 80% of the sold area. The 80% threshold is the same one used by the KALME map filter "Forest only", but here it is calculated from the areas declared in the transaction, whereas the map filter uses the cadastral land composition. So the two selections are not identical.
  • Arable land: the same, but arable land makes up at least 80% of the sold area.
  • Area threshold: at least 1 ha. Smaller plots produce extreme €/ha values and distort the distribution.
  • Price per hectare: the transaction amount divided by the sold area (not the whole property's area). If an ideal share was sold, the area is already reduced accordingly.
  • Trimming: only values strictly within the interval 100 < price < 50,000 €/ha are included; the rest are discarded as obvious data errors or atypical transactions (gifts, transactions between related parties).
  • Statistic: the median, not the arithmetic mean — the median is not distorted by a few very expensive transactions.
  • Summary: the forest sample has 13,354 transactions, 114,584 ha, median sold area 5.5 ha. The arable land sample has 7,517 transactions.

This article contains no estimated, modelled or forecast figure. Everything is measured from registered transactions. Personal data is not published.

7. Frequently asked questions

How much does forest land cost per hectare in Latvia?

In 2026 (data through 6 August) the median price is 3,000 €/ha, and half of transactions happen in the range 1,350–4,190 €/ha. The calculation is based on 1,291 real transactions.

Are these figures a price forecast for my property?

No. They are a summary of registered transactions. The price of a specific property is set by the stand's age, species composition, accessibility and encumbrances. KALME does not value properties — we show what has really sold for nearby, and the user draws the conclusion.

Why do these figures differ from forest price calculators?

Calculators usually show an estimate, this article — registered transactions. The difference is also caused by split contracts (section 5), and by the fact that a calculator usually values the forest together with the timber stock, while the public transaction — not always.

How often are these figures updated?

The KALME transaction database is updated every month. This article will be recalculated once a year; the latest recalculation is noted at the start of the article, next to the date.

Sources and licenses